Pre-Grant Publication Number: 20090138116
Please help the USPTO examine the application by evaluating the relevance of the publicly submitted prior art to the patent application.
Peer To Patent forwards the Top 10 most relevant prior art submissions and their annotations to the USPTO.
Review this prior art and click on the thumbs up (or down) to indicate whether this submission should be forwarded to the USPTO.
If you login then you can add an annotation by typing in the box at the bottom of the screen to comment on the relevance of the prior art to the claims of the patent application.
Review this prior art and click on the thumbs up (or down) to indicate whether this submission should be forwarded to the USPTO.
If you login then you can add an annotation by typing in the box at the bottom of the screen to comment on the relevance of the prior art to the claims of the patent application.

Prior Art Detail
Summary / Description
| Summary / Description | Work control system for managing operation of power tools, has detector that repeatedly receives signals related to work progress of power tools from power tools at predetermined transmission intervals to detect work progress |
Basic Information
| Type of Prior Art | Issued Patents - US |
| Country | United States of America |
| Patent/Application # | 20030121677 |
| Kind Code | United States (US) - United STATES Patent - A |
| Patentee Name | Makita Corporation, Inc. |
| Relevant Pages, Columns, or Lines | Summary paragraph 2 [0006], De |
| URL | |
| Filing Date | December 23, 2002 |
| Additional Information | |
Notes / To Do
| Notes | |
Excerpt
Excerpt It is an object of the invention to provide work control system that can prevent an interference of the transmitting signals of the power tools in relation to the work progress. A representative work control system according to the present teachings may include a plurality of power tools and detecting device. Each of the power tools may transmit signals relating to the work progress. The detecting device may detect the work progress of each of the power tools by receiving and detecting the signals transmitted from the respective power tools. The signals relating to the work progress may be transmitted from each power tool several times. Preferably, the transmission intervals may vary among the power tools in order to prevent the signals from being confused.
A work control system according to the present teachings may include a plurality of power tools and detecting device. Each of the power tools may transmit signals relating to the work progress. The detecting device may detect the work progress of each of the power tools by receiving and detecting the signals transmitted from the respective power tools. The signals relating to the work progress may be transmitted from each power tool several times. Preferably, the transmission intervals may vary among the power tools in order to prevent the signals from being confused.
According to one aspect of the present teachings, a representative work control system to utilize power tools may be constructed. The system may include a plurality of power tools and a detecting device. The detecting device may receive signals in relation to work progress of the power tools. The signals may be transmitted from the respective power tools so that the detecting device may detect the work progress of each power tool. Each power tool may transmit signals several times and transmission intervals of the signals vary among the power tools. In other words, the time intervals in transmitting signals are different in relation to the respective power tools.
As a result, even if the detecting device receives signals relating to the work progress from power tools at the same time, the signals are subsequently transmitted from each power tool at the intervals that vary among the power tools. In other words, even if the detecting device receives the first signals from the plurality of power tools at the same time and even if any interference may be caused among the signals due to such receipt of the signals at the same time, the second signals can be transmitted from each power tool at different timing because the transmission intervals of the signals vary among the power tools. Thus, it is made possible to positively identify and control the work progress of each of the power tools without causing interference due to simultaneous reception of the signals. |
Relevance
Claims
1
Relevance
See the Excerpt.
See the Excerpt.
Claim Chart
Some
12
Relevance
See the Excerpt.
See the Excerpt.
Claim Chart
Some
20
Relevance
See the Excerpt.
See the Excerpt.
Claim Chart
All
0 days left








