<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Activity-based compatibility testing for preliminarily matched users via interactive social media</title>
    <link>http://peertopatent.org/patent/20110145050/activity</link>
    <description>Matchmaking between a plurality of users is facilitated. This may include providing a virtual space to the users that enables the user to interact in an immersive manner. Matches may be proposed between users, and then activities to be attempted by the matched users may be provided. The activities may be conducted via interactive, electronic social media. The interactive, electronic social media may include the virtual space and/or electronic social media hosted or provided by one or more third-parties. Based on the performance of matched users during an activity, user information may be released to the matched users. As such, before a user is provided with some information related to another user, the user must first participate in an interactive activity with the other user. This may facilitate deeper interactions between matched users.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <item>
      <title>From trying to find prior art, it does not seem...</title>
      <category>Activity-based compatibility testing for preliminarily matched users via interactive social media</category>
      <description>From trying to find prior art, it does not seem that there really is anything related to &amp;quot;social media&amp;quot; and matching people romantically.  With that said, social media use is just a series of activities, just like the general category of sports, within sports there is football, soccer, etc.  Within social media, there are blogs, twitter, facebook etc.  The process of comparing social media use is just the same as comparing if one likes to watch football or basketball.  It is clearly novel to compare social media use, but i think it is obvious to use it as a comparison.    </description>
      <pubdate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 15:34:16 -0700</pubdate>
      <guid>http://peertopatent.org/patent/20110145050/discussion</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
