Pre-Grant Publication Number: 20100303742
Collaborate on the process of community review for this application. Posting will not be forwarded to the USPTO.
Flagging a post as an ACTION ITEM signals further research. Flagging SPAM and ABUSE helps to manage discussion.
Placing double brackets around a reference to a claim or prior art will create a hyperlink to the original
ex. [[claim 1]] and [[prior art 2]].
Facilitator's Comment 
Action Item Show without Noise
4
Ryan Fantry (about 2 years ago)
In the beginning of the patent it describes the product to be wax free. Later in the patent under "Background of the Invention" they describe the product to be "virtually wax free". Which one is it? Does it have wax or doesn't it?3
Deepti Rajendran (about 2 years ago)
What distinguishes an invention? Is it the materials and ingredients it consists of/how it was made? Or, on the other, is it the uses it will be put to?Manny Schecter (about 2 years ago)
An invention must be distinguished in view of what is actually claimed. Here, the invention is claimed as a composition, not as a method of making the composition - so it is the ingredients that matters. 2
Sammy Lee (over 2 years ago)
I think the range is really important to distinguish a specific amount.1
Sarah Lawton (over 2 years ago)
Regarding Claim 00001 Why is this claim so narrow? Has anyone seen prior art which requires the inventor to import these specific ranges and preferred ingredients into the first claim? Manny Schecter (over 2 years ago)
I suspect the claims are so narrow in an attempt to distinguish over the references cited in the background section of the specification - that is where you are likely to see prior art along the lines you seek. 0 days left
