Pre-Grant Publication Number: 20100299299
Track the progress of public participation in the review of this pending patent application, and view
application details. The menu on the right will help you navigate this patent application. Subscribe to
the community enables you to receive updates on this application via email so that you can easly follow recent activity.
LATEST PRIOR ART
| Date | Title | Reviewer |
|---|---|---|
| 04/07/11 | COMPUTING MACHINERY AND INTELLIGENCE | Rishi Rawat |
| 02/14/11 | Wikipedia - Turing Test | Michael Clarke |
| 01/31/11 | The Consciousness Condumdrum | Susan Murray |
DISCUSSION
Rishi Rawat (about 2 years ago)
I am having a difficult time understanding what this patent is about. There does not seem to be an invention as others have noted. The author doesn't really say how a computer can be said to be self conscious. Seo Kyung Kim (about 2 years ago)
Prior Art Reference 753
In the section "Impracticality and irrelevance: the Turing test and AI research" of the prior art, we clearly see the difference between the actual research on AI and the the theoretic definition of "phenomena of life" this particular article tries to prove. The application tries to connect the implications of Turning test and AI research, which is argued impractical due to: 1. "There being an easier ways to test their programs other than Turning test" 2. "Creating life-like simulations of human beings is a difficult problem on its own that does not need to be solved to achieve the basic goals of AI research."Seo Kyung Kim (about 2 years ago)
Prior Art Reference 742 The Consciousness Condumdrum
I feel that the article submitted as a prior art is biased heavily on neurological analysis only. Although the patent application definitely lacks practical explanation of implementing "phenomena of life", I feel that this prior art and the patent application should be looked at from two totally separate views. In other words, I don't think the article submitted as a prior art has much relevance to the patent application. The patent application requires more of a computer science logic and algorithmic view, not neurological analysis.PEER TO PATENT ACTIVITY
All
Discuss Patent Applications
10 comments posted
Size of Community: 21
10 comments posted
Size of Community: 21
Upload + Explain Prior Art
3 submitted
3 submitted
Annotate and Evaluate Prior Art
1 prior art ratings
3 citations
1 prior art ratings
3 citations
Research Prior Art
0 research notes
0 research notes
WHAT IS THIS APPLICATION ABOUT
0 days left
